Comments on: Film savings from Overwrap vs. Flow wrap – not the only advantage

By: garage door repair sugar land

garage door repair sugar land — Tue, 11 Oct 2011 05:13:01 +0000

Its like you read my mind! You appear to know a lot about this, like you wrote the book in it or something. I think that you could do with some pics to drive the message home a bit, but other than that, this is magnificent blog. An excellent read. I will certainly be back.

By: novakautomation

novakautomation — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 15:28:52 +0000

well, you save more money if you buy one’s (machinery) that use rolls of film, not sheets. Money and time if you are agile enough.

By: Kate

Kate — Wed, 13 Jan 2010 15:17:17 +0000

Yes, the longer the run, the more efficient the production for overwrap.

By: sistemi ruleta

sistemi ruleta — Sun, 10 Jan 2010 00:38:06 +0000

Great idea, but will this work over the long run?

By: pengar roulette

pengar roulette — Fri, 08 Jan 2010 21:54:04 +0000

Sometimes it’s really that simple, isn’t it? I feel a little stupid for not thinking of this myself/earlier, though.

By: All American packaging | Packaging USA | Wrapping Supplies

All American packaging | Packaging USA | Wrapping Supplies — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:36:44 +0000

I think Overwrapping is best from flow wrapped, because a process in which a box-shaped carton, tray, bundle, etc. is wrapped and sealed. The only requirement for the package shape is that it have flat sides to be sealed. It is sometimes called diamond-fold wrapping, tuck-and fold wrapping, gift-box wrapping, cigarette wrapping and bundle wrapping. Tear tape can be used as an easy-open feature.

Regards,