technology leading overwrapping machinerylearn about overwrappingOverwrapping and sustainability

Keep on wrapping – Overwrapping, that is

April 28, 2010



In keeping with our product re-wraps for Wal-Mart, we were asked to do the same for Sam’s Club products.

re-wrapping products for Sam's Club

re-wrapping products for Sam's Club

It was an interesting exercise and we went at it with our usual enthusiams. That enthusiasm allowed us to get lost in Connecticut. While there are two  Sam’s Clubs in Massachusetts, there are none in western Massachusetts.

We came home with lots of candidates, of which three flow wrapped products are shown here. The films savings on the flow wrapped items range from 12.25% to 26%.

overwrap pkg looks better than shrink

overwrap pkg looks better than shrink

It is harder to do the film savings calculations in shrink wrapped items

because the film is shrunk, so that we do not know the original dimensions. We do know that there is waste cut off for recycling ordiscard and that the heat tunnel uses 60 amp service vs. our whole machine using 30 amp service. But we cannot be as specific on the film savings vs shrink wrap. We do know that they are a lot prettier.

Our newly wrapped versions are on their way to Sam’s Club this week.


About the author:

Kate Putnam is the primary author of the Package Machinery blog and maintains the company's Twitter feed: @wrapsustainably, in which she shares her perspectives on trends in packaging – especially those involving sustainability. Read Kate Putnam's Bio



Permalink to Keep on wrapping – Overwrapping, that is

1 Comment »

  • [...] more material than you need      Can there be too much material in the wrap? As a process, overwrap uses less film that shrink or flow wrap, but what else can be reduced or reused? Is the packaging the right size [...]

    Pingback by Package Machinery – Overwrapping Machines » Unsustainability in packaging — June 30, 2010 @ 4:08 pm

  • Leave a comment

    Website by Studio99Creative